Emily Zemler
Updated on: October 13, 2024 1:27 am GMT
Award-winning podcast hosts James Duncan and Fuhad Dawodu, collectively known as Shxtsngigs, have recently found themselves at the center of controversy following remarks made during their appearance on the podcast Flagrant, hosted by comedian Andrew Schulz. The incident has sparked a wave of criticism, particularly regarding jokes that many listeners deemed racist and harmful towards Black women.
Duncan and Dawodu have openly apologized for their participation in the mocking remarks, admitting that they should have spoken out against the inappropriate comments made during the recording. This situation raises important discussions about accountability, the normalization of racist jokes, and the impact they can have on the community.
Controversy Erupts Over Podcast Remarks
The controversy began in July when Duncan and Dawodu joined Schulz on his podcast, where they discussed the so-called “black girlfriend effect.” This term has gained popularity among social media users who share before-and-after images of mixed-race couples, highlighting how their relationships with Black women have changed them. While noting that Black women elevate the style of their partners, Schulz made several jokes that many found offensive, specifically implying that white men change their appearance out of stress related to their relationships.
– Schulz’s most controversial comments included:
– Jokes suggesting that white men shave their heads due to stress from their Black girlfriends.
– Claims that these men grow beards as a cushion to absorb “slaps” from their partners.
Many listeners took offense, viewing these comments as perpetuating the harmful stereotype of the “angry Black woman.” The backlash was swift, with fans expressing disappointment that Duncan and Dawodu did not push back stronger against Schulz’s remarks.
Podcasters Respond After Backlash
In response to the uproar, Duncan and Dawodu issued a public apology, marking the beginning of their latest episode by acknowledging the gravity of their oversight.
Duncan described the experience during the podcast as shocking, stating, “There’s literally no excuse.” He illustrated the moment as a “fight or flight” response, where they felt paralyzed and unable to react the way they would have liked. Dawodu echoed this sentiment, explaining their laughter was an instinctive reaction in an uncomfortable situation rather than approval of the jokes.
Fans of the podcast expressed disappointment and frustration. One listener, Jorden Berkeley, noted that the duo should have provided at least “the slightest of pushback” against Schulz’s comments. The fallout highlights a broader issue regarding the expectation of accountability among influencers and public figures, especially when discussing race.
Schulz’s Defense and the Ongoing Discussion
Following the apology from Shxtsngigs, Schulz responded on his podcast, expressing sympathy for the duo’s situation. He stated that they could have asked to cut the jokes, but they chose not to. Schulz argued that their subsequent apology seemed insincere, suggesting it was a reaction to social media backlash rather than genuine regret.
In his comments, Schulz indicated that the lack of initial disapproval suggested that Duncan and Dawodu were comfortable with the remarks while recording. He further claimed, “What you have done is you have empowered the people who have tried to cancel you,” suggesting that their apology has intensified the controversy.
This exchange has sparked discussions about the impact of public apologies and the fine line between humor and harmful stereotypes.
A Reflection on Stereotypes
The fallout from this incident sheds light on the broader issue of how society discusses race and the impact of jokes that perpetuate stereotypes. The conversation around the “angry Black woman” trope has been ongoing, with many advocates calling for more respect and nuance in dialogue about race.
Duncan and Dawodu’s situation has prompted many to consider how minority perspectives are represented in media and pop culture. Their apology might serve as a turning point for personal accountability not only in comedy but also in various forms of media where marginalized groups are often the subject of jokes.
As public figures, Duncan and Dawodu’s reflection on their experience can open the door for meaningful conversations about race, humor, and responsibility in media. The challenge remains for all involved—hosts, comedians, and audiences alike—to navigate the delicate balance between humor and respect.
*James Duncan and Fuhad Dawodu during a recent recording session of their podcast. The duo has faced backlash over inappropriate jokes made on another podcast about Black women.*
Conclusion: Moving Forward
The incident involving Duncan and Dawodu serves as a critical reminder about the responsibilities that come with having a platform. As the dialogue continues about race, humor, and the media’s role in shaping narratives, it is crucial for influencers and content creators to recognize their impact.
Duncan and Dawodu’s apologies show that they want to learn and grow. However, it also reminds us to be careful when talking about sensitive subjects. People often look up to public figures for advice and support. When these leaders take responsibility, it can help us all make better choices about race and identity in the future.
